Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Fixing corporations...
- 2: Anomalous technology
- 3: company names
- 4: Authors, please do some research.
- 5: Executive Nonsense
- 6: Three kobolds in a trenchcoat
- 7: Ugh. fictional history vs reality
- 8: In jump, on the Free Trader All Sales are Final...
- 9: More powerful than chlorine triflouride!!!
- 10: Advice for magic users
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 06:05 am (UTC)The last one, shit, I almost vomited my heart right out my throat. Sadness ... my God.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 07:10 am (UTC)Doesn't mean it's not bad.
This sort of thing is why I think that it may be more important to break the link between "physical sex" and "gender role" than to make other "trans friendly" social changes.
The gender binary may cause problems, but being able to pick (or get away with) either role regardless of your actual "sex" would eliminate many of the worst problems.
At the very least it'd limit the violence to the folks who don't pass well or are obviously doing genderfuck. That soprt of violence ain't right either. But it somehow seems like it might be an "easier" social change.
Not that it's an easy or even likely one. :-(
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 07:17 am (UTC)I don't support the death penalty but I am full fledge force supportive of imprisonment, especially in situtations like above.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 09:53 am (UTC)Then again, imprisonment can't actually be taken back, but at least you are alive.
On the other hand imprisonment has it's own issues. And when you get right down to it, the odds are that unless they keep that guy in isolation the whole time he's in prison, he's likely to be killed anyway. By the other prisoners. (I've known ex-cons, they've got standards. That guys counts as scum by *their* standards, just like child molesters)
Imprisonment doesn't really *solve* the problem. It just postpones it. And it's actually a very recent practice.
I'd feel a lot better about imprisonment if the prisons didn't actually *encourage* a lot of criminal behavior. And they are the worst for the people who might actually have the best chance of being rehabilitated if we actually *tried* that anymore.
As it is, assaults, rape & extortion (ie "protection racket" type stuff) are "normal" in prisons. And most of the guards not only don't care, they *use* these things to keep "troublemakers" in line.
I love how the courts decided that 24/7 video surveillance violates prisoner's rights, but don't consider the assaults, rapes & murders that it'd prevent to be worthy of consideration.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 10:59 am (UTC)Prison is one of my biggest fears. I have trauma from police which has formed into phobia of prison. Learning about prison has been a way of facing my fears, even though in reality - prisons will always be here. I can do everything I can to remain OUT of one.
Going for the long shot since I don't know you quite well: Do you do public speaking? If not, have you considered it? I feel your voice and ideas are strong, and need to be heard. For whatever it's worth, these are the kind of voices that create change.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 01:09 pm (UTC)I am *terrible* at public speaking. And "arguing" things with people is even worse.
I might make an ok essayist, if such were still popular.
But between my abuse issues, PTSD from that and othyer things and my social anxiety/social phobia, public speaking is a *definite* no.
Especially with regards to anything emotionally charged.
I can be rendered mute for all practical purposes in such situations. Old "conditioning". :-(
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 04:14 pm (UTC)Big hugs with glitter on top and everything special.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 07:43 pm (UTC)Alas, DNA evidence is showing that a lot of "there is no doubt" cases convicted the wrong person.
I rather wonder what would turn up if we were re-examining evidence in cases where the defendant had been executed the way we are examining it in cases where the defendant is still around to protest his innocence.
Of course, the DAs and the states & feds have good reason to *not* want this done.
Eventually, we are going to have to do something to break the exalted status of "eyewitness testimony" in the eyes of the public. DNA is showing all too clearly what psychologists have been saying for decades. It's barely reliable at the best of times.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 08:12 pm (UTC)