On the nature of God
Sep. 13th, 2011 02:50 amI ran into the old chestnut about "Can God create a rock to big for Him to move?"
The standard answer is that it's a nonsense question.
But then it occurred to me that if God can set rules for the universe, maybe he can set rules that he has to follow. In that case, if he created a rock with the intent that he not be able to move it, then it would indeed be immovable, because he'd made that a new rule.
Different, but plausible, yes?
Then it hit me. God created man with free will. And if the above idea is true, he's stuck with us having free will.
That explains a *lot* of things about the world that are otherwise hard to square with am "omnipotent" deity. Most of what theologians refer to as "The Problem of Evil" to name but one.
The standard answer is that it's a nonsense question.
But then it occurred to me that if God can set rules for the universe, maybe he can set rules that he has to follow. In that case, if he created a rock with the intent that he not be able to move it, then it would indeed be immovable, because he'd made that a new rule.
Different, but plausible, yes?
Then it hit me. God created man with free will. And if the above idea is true, he's stuck with us having free will.
That explains a *lot* of things about the world that are otherwise hard to square with am "omnipotent" deity. Most of what theologians refer to as "The Problem of Evil" to name but one.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 11:30 am (UTC)The verse he was fondest of in that context was:
Matthew 18:1 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?
2 And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,
3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
I was always surprised how few "Christians" seemed to get his point.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 11:59 am (UTC)The combination meant It made human beings with free will, and then really, honestly couldn't understand why they DIDN'T do everything right, and tried sledgehammer approaches until finally coming to the conclusion that knowing the *facts* had to be, somehow, different from having the EXPERIENCE... which is why It became Jesus, lived a human life, and then went "Oh. THAT's what's going on."
Knowing all the facts is no substitute for having an experience.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-13 01:58 pm (UTC)If God doesn't want that rock to move, it's *not* going to move. :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-14 03:35 pm (UTC)