Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Fixing corporations...
- 2: Anomalous technology
- 3: company names
- 4: Authors, please do some research.
- 5: Executive Nonsense
- 6: Three kobolds in a trenchcoat
- 7: Ugh. fictional history vs reality
- 8: In jump, on the Free Trader All Sales are Final...
- 9: More powerful than chlorine triflouride!!!
- 10: Advice for magic users
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 05:17 pm (UTC)And I think it was a bit, um, well, I suppose it's obvious why the one complaint they actually voiced was from an older, presumably less sexually attractive, woman. Hmph.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 07:37 pm (UTC)You and I might be just as happy if it was cute guys in "painted on" thongs (or less!). But most folks wouldn't be.
There's also that whole double standard about nudity, too.
No doubt you've heard about the recent "incident" where it was rather graphically shown that Britney Spears wasn't wearing panties. (I find it rather silly, personally)
Now consider what would have happened if it'd been a *male* celebrity (say in a kilt, or even doing the Dennis Rodman thing and wearing a dress) who'd done such an accidental flash... He'd be lucky if he wasn't facing indecent exposure charges.
<sigh>