Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Fixing corporations...
- 2: Anomalous technology
- 3: company names
- 4: Authors, please do some research.
- 5: Executive Nonsense
- 6: Three kobolds in a trenchcoat
- 7: Ugh. fictional history vs reality
- 8: In jump, on the Free Trader All Sales are Final...
- 9: More powerful than chlorine triflouride!!!
- 10: Advice for magic users
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-11-19 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-19 01:11 am (UTC)http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/adopting_the_is.html
no subject
Date: 2010-11-19 01:02 pm (UTC)And recognizing that your trained people would have to be trained somehow for all the different regions of the USA, where the customs and reactions are going to differ, or else recognizing that the screening would inevitably be highly prejudiced against certain groups and in favor of others.
We already have a lot of people worried/complaining about, with justification, the sexism and racism, etc., inherent in our own procedures. The Israeli model, applied here, would make that VASTLY worse.
Add to the current mix a process in which it is *SOLELY THE DISCRETION OF THE INTERVIEWER* -- any interviewer -- that will remove you from a flight, and try to make people ACCEPT it? I just can't see that working here.
Worse is the fact that since it's easily conceivable that profiling will change as time goes on, a group which wouldn't be pulled out NOW might find itself unable to fly a couple years from now.