Re: Well ...

Date: 2022-07-24 10:03 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
I was thinking more of size & Function than construction. Mostly because I was thinking in terms of what "services"/"functions" would be needed.

Regarding dome construction, I recall an article from the 60s or early 70s that noted in some places the building code only let dome homes have 2 floors because of the slanting walls. So the second floor was ridiculously high ceilinged.

I've seen some SF illustrations that had buildings that were not domes but rather sections of spheres sliced at higher latitudes (ie instead of at the equator, at the 54th parallel or higher. Some very much higher.

Sort of a "blister" design if you will.

These strike me as good for some weather conditions. The shallower the angle with which the edge of the dome meets the ground, the less wind resistance there is (or the less wave resistance :-)

Not as space efficient, but not bad if you want a *large* floor. One I saw was some sort of spaceport facility with hangar doors around the edge. Which left the inside for large support areas and a *much* smaller second floor for something else.

Sections of oblate and prolate spheroids might have their uses as well.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 01:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios