*Growl*!
The London Times needs to trash whoever wrote this and whichever editor let it get published.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3284-1828954,00.html
Ok, the writer is not thrilled, that's fine. But perhaps if they had bother to find out what goes on before getting SRS. And that it doesn't get done for reasons as trivial as they seem to think it is done for they'd have either written a different article or kept their *uninformed* opinion to themselves.
Edit:
Apparently this was an opinion piece in something a bit like a "letters to the editor" sectiuon. So the standards are a hair different.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3284-1828954,00.html
Ok, the writer is not thrilled, that's fine. But perhaps if they had bother to find out what goes on before getting SRS. And that it doesn't get done for reasons as trivial as they seem to think it is done for they'd have either written a different article or kept their *uninformed* opinion to themselves.
Edit:
Apparently this was an opinion piece in something a bit like a "letters to the editor" sectiuon. So the standards are a hair different.
no subject
S(he)'s a jolly good Fellow
If there were a mirror to see in to the very soul of these people that there is feminine and masculine in all of us they would be loath to criticize.
Re: S(he)'s a jolly good Fellow
Re: S(he)'s a jolly good Fellow
Re: S(he)'s a jolly good Fellow
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)