There seem to be four arguments as to when "life begins". Or, rather, when "being a human" starts.
- Life begins at conception
- life begins when a heartbeat is detected (about 6 weeks, brain waves start around the same time)
- When the fetus is viable
- At birth
Let's take these in reverse order.
"At birth" pretty much ends the abortion issue. Won't make a lot of people happy, but it ends it.
"Viability" Is relatively clearcut, and few abortions are performed at/after that point anyway. (The "late term" abortions you hear so much talk about are usually because the fetus is already dead, or wouldn't survive for various reasons)
"Heartbeat" has several problems. One is that the time frame (~six weeks) means that the mother may not even realize that she's pregnant yet. Her period would only be 2 weeks late.
Also "heartbeat" or "brain waves" aren't much of an indication of anything except that the clump of cells is growing, *probably* normally. We don't use a heartbeat as an indicator of life for *adults* any more. Braindead people can still have heartbeats.
Brain wave activity? Well we often use that in cases where we are trying to decide whether or not to turn off life support. I'd *really* interested in what sort of brain waves they are talking about at six weeks.
In any case, this has most of the bad features of our final choice.
Finally, "life begins at conception". Not only , "non", but HELL no!!!
This idea has utterly *horrible* consequences. That's because it that is a *legal* rule, then there are legal consequences.
Consider the realities of what happens after a sperm fertilizes an egg. It's actually *common* for the egg to not attach to the uterine wall. In which case it gets flushed when the person has their period.
If life begins at conception, that'd be the death of a "human being". and thus have to be investigated as to cause of death, and who is responsible.
Think *hard* about what it would take to even *detect* this, much less investigate it.
Also think of the consequences of the investigation. If it is ruled due to some action on the part of the person, then it's either homicide, or manslaughter. I don't need to tell you what that means.
If it's ruled accidental, there are *still* legal consequences.
Later on the eggs that do attach can have problems resulting in miscarriage. When I originally wrote on these issues, I pointed out that the laws could treat that, to as a death to be investigated. to be legally consistent.
Alas, in the decades since a number of states have indeed passed laws that require investigating miscarriages as potential murders. And they have *done so* on a number of occasions.
That is a *horrible* thing to do to someone who wanted the baby. And it's far from a picnic for anyone else either.
Again, this "justifies" incredible invasions of privacy. the same social media algorithms that get people deluged with ads for pregnancy care and baby stuff, can also be used to folag someone who was pregnant but isn't anymore. Or who is looking for ways to terminate their pregnancy.
Big Brother is here and he *is* watching.
I'll leave you to imagine other measures yourself.
But basically, it amounts to making women, *all* women* third class citizens, subject to huge invasions of privacy, and limitations on their activities.
Anyone who thinks *this* is a proper solution to *anything* is both ignorant *and* evil
