... but rather obvious. It's sorta equivalent to the old saying: "The race may not always go to the swift, nor the battle to the strong... but that's the way to bet." Similarly, yes, someone may be following accurate logic down a wrong path, and another reaching the right conclusions through completely erroneous means, but if you're going to have to make a call, the logical approach is more likely to be right. Especially if it's a COMPREHENSIVE logical approach; the usual way in which someone "goes wrong with confidence" is by narrowly defining their problem space and ignoring crucial facts just outside of the domain they want to consider.
It's true enough...