More legislative idiocy.
About that Mississippi "religious protection" bill. This section is going to give some lawyers *lots* of fun.
that “male” and “female” refer to someone’s “immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics at time of birth.
Ah yes, ignorance of biology strikes again.
Sex is *subjectively* determined by doctors at time of birth. There are "standards" for making the determination, but they aren't always followed.
And even when they are followed they are pretty damned arbitrary. Stuff like length of penis/clitoris.
Genetic testing is rarely done on newborns. When it is, it's because genetic problems are suspected *or* because doctors are having trouble figuring out what sex the baby is.
So a lot of intersex babies *don't* get IDed at birth. Anybody with AIS/CAIS for example. Or guevedoces.
There aren't just two sexes even if the public (and most doctors) would like to believe there are.
And gender is even *more* complicated.
Some day we are going to have to get laws put in place recognizing the *spectrums* of sex & gender. Because that's what it's going to take to end this sort of nonsense.
that “male” and “female” refer to someone’s “immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics at time of birth.
Ah yes, ignorance of biology strikes again.
Sex is *subjectively* determined by doctors at time of birth. There are "standards" for making the determination, but they aren't always followed.
And even when they are followed they are pretty damned arbitrary. Stuff like length of penis/clitoris.
Genetic testing is rarely done on newborns. When it is, it's because genetic problems are suspected *or* because doctors are having trouble figuring out what sex the baby is.
So a lot of intersex babies *don't* get IDed at birth. Anybody with AIS/CAIS for example. Or guevedoces.
There aren't just two sexes even if the public (and most doctors) would like to believe there are.
And gender is even *more* complicated.
Some day we are going to have to get laws put in place recognizing the *spectrums* of sex & gender. Because that's what it's going to take to end this sort of nonsense.
no subject
no subject
That *alone* is going to cause problems for that sort of law. :-)
And the fact that 1 in 1000 births has *some* degree of intersex and the pushback against doctors "correcting" *functional* genitalia (especially doing so without consulting the parents) has been growing for decades. So sooner or later we'll have somebody in the news who is intersex and not trying to hide it. That'll drive another nail in this.
My short story Intended Consequences deals with somebody trying this with some near future tech. And all the fun that ensues.